Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
so more war?
i swear I remember Obama calling the order to bomb Libya (why do I always think of woman parts when typing that country's name? lol) to support the people who wanted to overthrow the government.
Syria is hypocritical... why not intervene there when we intervened in Libya?? Syrians are not as important to us maybe? I dont know.. it seems hypocritical on our administrations part. I do know our goverment has thrown its verbal support behind the rebels in Syria, just not fire power support.
Personally, I dont want to mess with China or Russia. Doesnt seem like a smart thing to do at all.
We dont own the middle east... there are no American States or territories there. Either we are going to support every damn thing with our military and tax money or not. It's a tough situation. Nothing you posted above seem to be better solutions than what has already been done, IMO. Just more money and more lives.
Ron Paul! Lets protect our borders with the best of our strengths.
I'm tired of being the world police, the world "leader". If you look throughout history, once a country becomes the "world leader" it is ALL downhill from there.
|
It did not have to be war, but more support for those trying to overthrow these terrorist governments and help in organizing true democracies instead of sitting on the sidelines. You touched on my point with Syria, we have sent no clear message to anyone and no analyzation can justify action in Libya but no action in Syria. Isolationism is worst possible policy and has never worked. Look where it got us with Hitler.