Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
NPR is not a "blog".
The judge did not rule on the constitutionality, he was not asked to rule on the constitutionality, he was asked, and he ruled only not to give an injunction while the constitutionality goes to the higher court to be addressed.
You can't possibly still be disputing that, are you? You are saying you think the judge ruled the law unconstitutional? No, he didn't.
The judge only ruled against a temporary injunction. He only ruled the law can go into effect (no injunction) while the constitutionality goes to the higher court to be addressed before November.
|
Law upheld as constitutional. Repeats over and over in the pdf.