08-15-2012, 04:01 PM
|
|
The Curragh
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manningtown, Colorado
Posts: 2,727
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Yes, according to the legal opinions that have been stated about what it was the judge was ruling upon, which was only the injunction. The judge was asked to stop the current implementation, while the constitutionality is determined. The judge chose not to block implementation while the constitutionality is being determined.
Try this, it's pretty detailed:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolit...-supreme-court |
http://www.pacourts.us/NR/rdonlyres/...Inj_081512.pdf
This is more detailed. And not a blog.
__________________
don't run out of ammo.
|