and back to the topic at hand (gotta love the title to this thread
)
judge rules:
http://news.yahoo.com/pennsylvania-j...141100233.html
He found that the civil rights groups
failed to show that the law was unconstitutional under all circumstances since it applies to all qualified voters, requiring them to present a photo ID that can be obtained for free. Judges would also be stationed at polling places on Election Day to resolve individual disputes, he added.
While Simpson acknowledged that political interests may have motivated the legislators who voted for the law, that did not make the law unconstitutional, he said.
much like the scotus ruling a few years ago. the burden to get i.d. is the same for all, the law isn't discriminatory.