Quote:
|
Originally Posted by timmgirvan
DTS: you still only tell the facts as you see them,and Hans wants another 15 mins of fame as an expert! Do you honestly believe that there was no movement of WMD's to Syria and other areas? What was Saddam dancing for 8 months,if not to clear out the evidence. Is Sarin gas deadly enough for you? The book "DISINFORMATION" details the stockpiles that were moved,as well as other info that MSM will not print. Russia supplied info on links between Al Queda and Hussein...nobody talks about that. The entire civilised world considered Saddam a threat not only to peace,but stability in region as well. "blinkers ON" bro! PS Still waiting for comment on previous post to you
|
ok Timm,
I'll start with your last request.
The way to a peaceful resolution is to arrange negotiations including, but not limited to, the Shias, Sunnis, Kurds, an Iranian representative (as Iraq will become a theocracy later), and a US "moderator". The USA is unable to resolve this "war" without the assistance of other Mideast Governments.
As far as the wmd's...if they were in"fact" moved to Syria (part of the axis of evil), how come they haven't been used?
My understanding is:
1) There were no nuclear weapons.
2) Biological weapons were extended beyond their "shelf life" and no longer effective.
3) Chemical weapons. Though used by Saddam against the Kurds (despicable), might still exist. I really don't know. Is there proof that they remain? If so, where, and why haven't they been used by the "rougue state" they were shipped to for the past five years?
With sanctions in place and ongoing inspections, Saddam was not the threat to the rest of the world that was "sold". Hence, the change of "mission" from finding wmd's to regime change, to providing "democracy"..to refereeing a civil war.