Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
Computers don't usually just 'glitch' for no readily apparent reason.
That, taken with the extreme unlikeliness that this happened with a horse that won by 16.5 lengths defies what you are saying about it not being a betting coup.
Perhaps, if it was a coup, the people behind this had the ability to wager with good old fashioned bookies that would pay full track odds.
They still do exist, believe it or not. Or perhaps they had a way to wager at a site not in the USA? I know in Mexico, for instance, I used to be able to wager and get track odds, without being tied in.
Knowing something about how computers work, I'd say it's nearly impossible that the computer glitched itself in such a highly specific and detailed way.
Humans had to be involved, and I don't care about what sort of nonsensical spin that the officials are eventually going to throw our way as explanation.
|
But even if you had this, how much action do you really think the bookies would take?
I'm not sure how the Mexican site worked, but I'm not sure many people would be comfortable depositing that type of money needed to make this thing worth while.