View Single Post
  #7  
Old 05-18-2012, 06:08 AM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
I'll rephrase: He knew the story had already been explained as the obvious mistake it was. He knew the truth. But he published it anyway. Because apparently all the right-wing loons have this election cycle to feed the Obama hate is recycling Rev. Wright and trying to re-light birtherism?



Yet there sits the certified, verified, beyond-a-doubt birth certificate. There sits two newspaper publications of the birth.

Those documents from the past are discarded, ignored and great lengths (and conspiracies) are created to explain that reality away, while the explanation of a mistake in a promotional pamphlet is denied as coverup.

Good lord. Birtherism is a more ridiculous, lunatic conspiracy theory than the moon landings never happened. Talk about having to create unbelievable gyrations and denial of reality in order to believe it. My god. This country is a laughingstock overseas with "birthers".
His birth certificate has been certified, verified, beyond a doubt? There is tons of evidence to the contrary.

What did Obama's own lawyer Alexandra Hill say about the authenticity of the birth certificate?

You probably never thought that Rev. Wright was a legitimate issue. I don't understand that because if a republican was running for President and it came out that his pastor was constantly preaching anti-black sermons, you would think that was a huge deal.
Reply With Quote