Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Oops, sorry, I wrote an answer but mixed up Sherrod and ACORN. So deleted it. My bad.
Lissen, I don't care what the NY Times thinks - I care that it was found that Breitbart LIED and ACORN did not do what it was accused of.
|
You can hang your hat on your conclusion. I will hang my hat on the fact that the New York Times said the most damning evidence against ACORN on the videos was legitimate.
Here is a quote from your article from a previous post: "Investigations by former Massachusetts Attorney General Scott Harshbarger, Brooklyn District Attorney Charles J. Hynes, California Attorney General Jerry Brown, and the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, among others, have served to exonerate ACORN of the most outrageous charges of criminality (while still criticizing ACORN employees and leadership).
It says the Attorney Generals and DAs were critical of ACORN employees and their bosses. Just because nobody was charged with a crime, that doesn't mean that they didn't do anything wrong. They obviously did plenty wrong and that is why the AGs, the DAs, and the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service were very critical of ACORN.