View Single Post
  #2  
Old 04-20-2012, 12:35 AM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
Maybe they could have run a length faster.
Or the measured difference that a study quoted earlier here found.

Quote:
Is that worth drugging every horse so now they all run a length faster?
If you take an aspirin for a sore knee, are you a "drugged performance enhancer"? And nobody has ever said lasix should be given to every horse.

Quote:
Sturdier is an assumption based on rapidly declining starts per year, which happens to coincide with the use of Lasix.
That also coincides 100% with the advancement of the Mayan calendar.

Quote:
As for your science, there have been studies done that show it does enhance performance among non-bleeders. You posted it yourself if I'm not mistaken.
That's right, I posted three studies about performance. What did they say again?

The thread has now come full circle. Some that are sure lasix is a performance enhancer ruining the sport will not be dissuaded by any evidence to the contrary.

Kasept and Cannon wrote some very insightful posts in the first few pages. Worth a re-read.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote