Quote:
|
Originally Posted by avance2000
.....take it. that is all i can say. take it. you owe us that. us rational people had to listen to your bs for a long time. "he was as good as secretariat. he was way better than barbaro. well guess what......he was not.
i fully expect people to attack me for "ripping" bernardini after that race and his defenders may blast me for this post. i'm fine with that, in part because - as my signature this last week probably reveals - i had a nice day at the windows today. but the bottom line is that we had to listen to your irrational and unjustified comments about this horse for months. now sit back and let us rational people take the stage for awhile. you were flat-wrong. when your boy met a quality animal he folded up like a cheap suit.
he is no invasor. he is no barbaro. secretariat? it isn't even worth discussing.
the best horse won today. there is no question about that....and i'm not just saying it after the fact.....i have been saying it on this board for awhile.
|
You're a clown. I was ready to come on here and give you respect for picking Invasor, but you've proven with this post what an absolute joke you are.
He wasn't better than Barbaro? Really? So we're assuming based on a FL Derby and KY Derby win that Barbaro would've beaten Invasor in the BC Classic. Right.
He's not Secretariat and I never said he was. He's better than Barbaro. Period. Barbaro, even though by tragic circumstance, never made it past the Preakness. This horse did. He's years ahead of Barbaro in terms of accomplishments.
He folded like a cheap suit? Okay.. Right. He ****ing ran second by a length you chump. Coming on here acting like he ran up the track like that Lava Man fraud so many touted as "tough as a bulldog", blah blah ****ing blah.
I was going to give you respect, but you obviously aren't capable of the same.
Enjoy homie.. By the way, did Mauralakana cross the finish line yet?