Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
i agree with you, point, and with tim-they always go for the maximum they feel they can get. it's what cost the state a successful prosecution of casey anthony, as it was the only charge they sought. had they allowed finding of a lesser charge, i believe she'd have gotten a guilty-perhaps for involuntary manslaughter.
i'm afraid this case has gotten so muddied in the press that a successful prosecution is next to impossible. finding an untainted jury pool will be difficult at best. it's why i mentioned a plea deal-the state ought to seek one, and zimmerman and his attorney might agree that they would all be better served if they can do that. however, at this point zimmerman might feel he can be completely cleared. his lawyer had mentioned a possibility of a plea deal, but said he still had plenty of things to look over before he'd think any further about it.
i'm figuring the family did the right thing in pushing this, as i don't feel the case is a cut and dried deal based on the stand your ground law. however, the same thing that brought about a charge could negate any trial, because the same press who shed light on the case has gone completely overboard with it now.
i read zimmerman is receiving death threats-i always find that appalling. people are outraged over a murder, so they want to commit one. how in the hell does that make sense?
|
I would not want to represent Zimmerman regardless of whether he is guilty of not. I think it would be very difficult for him to get a fair trial with the bloodthirst the media has had for this case. Couple that with the pressure that people like Sharpton and Jackson place on potential jurors and the notion that juries let people walk because of the perception that a few high profile defendants got away with crimes because of dumb juries (most of those whom criticize did not sit in the courtroom and see all the evidence), it seems to me that finding a fair jury pool will be very difficult.