Quote:
Originally Posted by Ocala Mike
I'm starting to think that there must be something in the evidence not yet made public that weighs heavily on the side of this prosecutor. Would make sense, too, and would kind of justify the original conclusion 45 days ago not to arrest Z because the evidence wasn't available then.
This late-emerging evidence, I believe, has to do with either:
1. The gunshot wound that took Trayvon out. Could it possibly have been fired from other than close range? Obviously, that crushes Z's case.
2. The voice analysis on the 911 tapes. Was that Z or Trayvon yelling?
|
3. There was a 2nd shooter in the grassy knoll.