Quote:
Originally Posted by Calzone Lord
Trakus is a great thing.
I like Beyer's idea about inviting user feedback and looking for errors that might otherwise go undetected.
Right now, they need a quality control person who has an understanding of pace figures and speed figures to review the data everyday. The 'mistakes' like Beyer mentions in the mile and 40-yard races at Tampa is a issue at other distances as well. It's all stuff that can be cleaned up and corrected. I have theories on it from all the monitoring that I will pass on to Pat when Tampa and GP's meets are done.
Inviting user feedback + a suitable quality control guy to deal with the feedback and review all the data should equal a winning formula because I think these 'mistakes' can be prevented ahead of time.
|
Appreciate feedback and welcome it from anyone on here. There is much underway with Trakus, and still a long way to go. Just wanted to add that the Tampa issue referenced in the article was addressed soon after it was identified in January and adjusted.
I'm certainly new on board with the company, but the passion is strong, the will to consistently improve is there, and the more input we get, the better...and I can definitely confirm LONG LONG LONG hours. Anyway who wants to drop me a direct message, I'll be happy to discuss more.