Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
yep, 35k to one, 45k to another. that's not unfounded, when you see there were settlements.
but, it's de rigueur to blame the victim in these cases. she either 'made it up' or had it coming, or maybe she egged it on, and then went for money...  there's certainly never anything to the charges. besides, if women stayed home where they belonged, men couldn't misbehave. damned uppity women. |
Cain has gone into full-on attack mode today, he started a website, where a campaign contributor, who does "private investigative work", declares he used his machine that can detect nervousness on the sound of the televised press conference from the second accuser - and determined Herman is innocent!
I f-ucking kid you not.
Quote:
Herman Cain has made clear his position on the accusers who say he sexually harassed them — or worse — while CEO of the National Restaurant Associations: they’re liars.
Now the campaign has an entire website dedicated to driving that message home, CainTruth.Com. The hastily-put-together blog appears to be primarily dedicated to spreading damaging stories about the women who have come forward, especially Sharon Bialek, who has publicly accused Cain of demanding sex in exchange for help finding her work.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/1...=sidebyuserrec
|
It's simply amazing how unrepentent blind narcissists - like those that, during a sexual harassment scandal, call the former Speaker of the House "Princess Nancy" on television - think that if they just keep denyin', these peasants will stop pointing out the truth and inconveniencing them.