Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Whether or not I am being sensitive doesn't change a certain responsibility in making comments. Your comments would suggest that you believe that corruption currently exists at NYRA and that this was basically obvious. These are two beliefs that I do not agree with and feel strongly should only be made if one can specifically back them up. Frankly, I expect idiocy from that other poster here, as she probably has trouble with Velcro, but you do know better. You have every right to not like NYRA, or any organization you so choose, but by the same token you have a certain responsibility in your claims, especially those kinds, and vagueness is not a reasonable defense.
|
I like the NYRA and I feel that my post no way implied that there was still on-going corruption inside the NYRA. I also believe that statements made should be able to be backup as well. I have been on both sides of the fence. But, in my opionin, no way did my statement imply or infer that there is ongoing corruption inside the NYRA. Again, I like the NYRA and I think they do a good job. I just think there is a better group out there that can do an even better job.