05-26-2011, 07:40 PM
|
|
Jerome Park
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NTamm1215
As usual, you've made yourself look silly in this thread again. Congrats, though, on handily winning the Joe Silverio Post In Every Thread Award. Mott's numbers with older horses are AWFUL compared to Ward's. 17%, $1.48 ROI vs. 23%, $1.69 ROI.
It would have just been easier/smarter for you to say, "yeah, it's stupid to say you just automatically toss a given trainer's horses."
|
Didn't John Candlin have a pretty healthy ROI as well?
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
|