Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
Have you even given this any honest consideration, or are you just dismissing what I say because the implications are ugly?
|
Their dismissing it, because they know you're a lune, and your an apologist for a great deal of the planet's Islamic thuggery. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that you are not happy that the biggest enemy of this Gov't just got owned solely by members of this Gov't. You're not alone, I've heard that
1)"he was dead already,"
2) that "he isn't dead, "
3) "Quadaffi got bombed, and we wanted the focus off that."
4) "It's close to 10 years since 9/11"
When people don't like something, they do these things. It's shifting, distracting, distorting etc. Your effort is a version of #1. We don't have to give you any more evidence than the photos of him being dead. If you want to prove he was in deep freeze for 2 years, do it. It's on you (not us.) Your version is the one that needs a lot more evidence(not the version we've heard so far.) So far, a large part of your "evidence" is simply stating that there is not enough evidence for the version you don't like. This is not evidence supporting your version. This is simply your chosen way of manipulating a situation. You've always done these things.... Won't stop.