View Single Post
  #6  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:59 AM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
If only you ever read a newspaper, or an internet news story Then you'd know why she filed the recount

Dog and Pony Show. Again she declared victory based on 200 votes and we are recounting after a 7,000 vote victory.

BTW what the local papers and comments are saying (in Wisconsin not Huffington)


Given the vote margin, should the taxpayers being paying for the state Supreme court recount?



We didn't record your vote, because this poll has been closed.

Response Percent Votes
Yes 33% 45 votes
No 64% 86 votes
No opinion 1% 2 votes
133 total votes

Return to previous page

reader COMMENTS noretreat
Apr 29, 2011 at 7:18 a.m.
Suggest removal The law should be changed that you can ask for the recount within that margin, but if you lose your paying for it.

There is no real resaon for this recount and the Klop. team wouldnt have bothered if their own money was at risk.
donnaw
Apr 29, 2011 at 6:45 a.m.
Suggest removal It's funny, the people that are for the recount are the same ones that thought it was okay for the 14 to run away to Illinois rather than do their jobs. And for the protestors to use fake doctor excuses.
partarican1
Apr 28, 2011 at 4:53 p.m.
Suggest removal it is allowable under the law, so why should she not have the right to a recount?
BornInWiscosnin
Apr 27, 2011 at 8:53 p.m.
Suggest removal This question makes it sound like this is money out of our pockets. I think most of the "cost" is the salary of people who will be doing the recount, but who would be getting that salary anyway. We taxpayers have already paid for their services. Perhaps a better question would be, do we want them to do the recount or some other whatever-it-might-be thing they would do instead? I mean no disrespect whatsoever for those people and their important and honorable jobs.
kaysbrew
Apr 27, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.
Suggest removal No count with that big of a margin has ever been reversed in Wisconsin or any other state. This may be within the law but doesn't mean you need to abuse the taxpayers for it.


http://wclo.com/polls/2011/apr/taxpa...count/results/
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote