[jms62]

Originally Posted by joeydb

I guess the passion tends to colorize my language. And unfortunately, e-mail and postings cannot convey the inflection and intonations with which one makes his points. As I pointed out above, my most frequently used "inflammatory" word, murder, is not inaccurate for life beginning at conception and active means being taken thereafter to destroy the cell(s). I'm not necessarily angry or passionate every time I say "murder". It's just accurate given those philosphical points of departure.

The pro-choicers tend to be inflammatory as well, though maybe not to the same degree since the Court has ruled in their favor. If, Roe is eventually overturned, you'll see a reversal in those roles.

Nobody "trained" me. I've never attended any pro-life functions, rallies, demonstrations. The views on either side stem from where you think life begins. The rest just follows from there. If life does not begin at conception, as some would contend, then that indivdual would not have as much of a moral problem with abortion. And their views, if expressed passionately, would read as a pro-choice flyer.

joey... You often post about Obama and the soaring deficit but have no problem with the Tens of Billions of taxpayer dollars spent debating this issue that was resolved nearly 40 years ago. How do you reconcile that? Is it ok to spend unabated on things that you care about yet wrong to spend money trying to keep the unemployed afloat while Big Business sells the country down the river?