View Single Post
  #7  
Old 03-17-2011, 12:18 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb View Post
There has also been confusion, possibly deliberate, between values in microsieverts and millisieverts (1000 microsieverts).
Just do the math and move the decimal point It's not deliberate, they are just trying not to use alot of zeros following a decimal point

Quote:
When values were reported days ago, they were compared to "a chest x-ray". Well, if it takes one second of an open shutter to get an x-ray, a rate of radiation of that level in the environment would be 3600 times that per hour!
Naw, just throw that above thought out - trust me, it's not an accurate comparison (chest x-rays are usually taken at 1/120 of a second, but the radiation is not the same, you can't use that in a formula for exposure)

The chest x-ray comparison is a good one, you can trust that.

One chest x-ray is 0.1 mSv (millisevert) of biologic exposure
One year of hanging around on earth is 3 mSv of biologic exposure

The CDC has lots of charts explaining the difference between the radiology terms used for radiation emitted from something, versus biologic exposure risk, versus energy absorbed by tissue during exposure.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote