View Single Post
  #32  
Old 02-13-2011, 01:16 PM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Strangely, in spite of what is claimed by the right-wing Heritage, those spending cuts have nothing at all to do with the majority of the money spent in the past 4-6 years. Nor does it address what caused our deficits, and what is continuing to contribute to the deficit. Here's what has caused our deficits:



BTW, the majority of TARP has already been paid back, with us making a profit of $53 billion in interest.

Those spending cuts come out of only 14-17% of our budget (the rest is defense, entitlements, etc - which are not touched, apparently, by Heritage's recommendations) are are simply the usual right-wing culture wars on education, FDA, EPA, etc.

Nothing new there. Except that if conservatives really wanted to touch that stuff, they would have already done so when they were in control. They don't like to cut, they like to spend. How Dems got to be known as the party of spend is a mystery, as the last 40-60 years show the GOP excelling at it.

In fact, that reminds me, the current GOP in the House said that everything in the budget must be funded - except for tax cuts. The GOP loves giving unfunded tax cuts. Cut the governments revenue, but don't stop spending - put it on the credit card. Reagan, Bush I, Bush II - they all did it. Uniquely a GOP phenomenon, and that's exactly what gave us our huge trillions in deficit today.

We could eliminate the majority of our deficit - that huge dark gold area-under-the-curve on the graph, above - by simply allowing the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest to expire. Obama should not have just caved to the GOP on that. Bringing home the troops from the wars will get another good chunk.
We went through this before. The producer of the graph is the CBPP a left wing think tank.

Here try this one out. It's simply the deficit. Now if Bush tax cuts existed pre Obama as did his wars etc etc. Something else is way out of wack starting in 2009. From just over 400 billion to 1,850 billion? WTF happened other than what was going on when Bush was President? We f'd up and went with the belief we need to spend to prevent going broke. With that obvious failure behind us let's take a huge breath and return to 2008 spending that many Dems obviously felt was excessive, as a starting point.

__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote