View Single Post
  #18  
Old 12-30-2010, 04:46 PM
MaTH716's Avatar
MaTH716 MaTH716 is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stonegossard View Post
No...he's not claiming having 90% winners. I suggest you actually look at the site before making a jacka@@ out of yourself.




Stats: 1st. 9 90% 2nd. 7 70% 3rd. 6 60% 4th. 8 80% Exa: 6 60% Tri: 5 50% Sups: 3 30%
The stats are really ridiculous. Especially that he is basing it after going 4 deep in every race. That's $80 a race he's technically investing, how about some sort of ROI number, that would be a little more pertinent then taking credit for a %90 win rate when going 4 deep in every race.

Maybe I could buy it for Turfway with all the big field and cheap races that seems very hard to hit (I personally hate the place). But he has the same format for Santa Anita. He is 4 deep in every race. The opener only had a five horse field. If that doesn't speak volumes, I'm not sure what will.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
Reply With Quote