Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite
The list is "absurd" you say ... but ...
... of the nearly 70 horses on it ... you cite only 5 possible exceptions ... and provide no data ... none whatsoever ... to support your insipid ... as always ... assertions.
Hey Annie-Phonie ... why don't you cite their Lifetime AEI's ... or their SW% ... or their Broodmare CI's ... or their lists of successful sons at stud?
Huh ... huh ... huh? Or could it be .. once again .. that you're full of crap ... and haven't the slightest idea of what you're saying?
|
Still waiting for this to be backed up with some facts.
She's supposed to be a pedigree "expert" ... and she calls my post "totally absurd" ... yet she cites not a single fact ... not a single piece of data ... not a single Lifetime AEI, SW%, CI, or any other statistic ... to back up her claim that the 67 champions I cited weren't failures at stud.
This happens all the time, my friends ...