Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
I hope you're kidding. You would be hard pressed to find a single person that knows what they're looking at
All you have to do is look at the way she was moving. You don't have to be a vet or a trainer to see it. If you have any sort of eye for horses at all, you would be able to see it.
|
Speaking of your impeccable "eye for horses"
I'm just wondering if you will keep your word and eat your racing form as you promised in the following thread.
http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21060
You write about a $650,000 sales topper 2-year-old - and claim "If he's not a stakes horse, I will eat my Racing Form"
That horse never managed to do anything more than string a couple of moderate published workouts on a few separate occasions. He's still winless.
But that wasn't all ... Rupert did singe out one unraced horse who "couldn't run a lick" in that thread ... he turned out to be 3-time Graded Stakes winning sprinter Munnings.
Yes, that's the kind of impeccable eye us dummies all lack.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
Steve Haskins is not a vet or a trainer. He could see it.
|
While no one could ever dispute the impeccable eye (for dapples) Haskin has - he also mentioned before the race that Blame might be better off if positioned behind Zenyatta early on. A laughably absurd idea.