View Single Post
  #7  
Old 09-24-2010, 08:42 AM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parsixfarms View Post
First off, it's a NYSRWB rule, not a "NYRA rule." A few years ago (after an incident at Saratoga involving the DQ of a Kimmel horse ridden by the Mig that was tons the best), the rule was changed from a "foul is a foul" to give the stewards some leeway to determine whether the impact altered the outcome of the race (akin to "no harm, no foul" in basketball). Because 3% of the purse is paid for 5th place at NYRA tracks, it would be surprising if the rule would only be applied for the first four places.

The description that you provided seems to be about the Pelican Lake incident (from August 6), one of a few controversial calls/non-calls at the Saratoga meet. (FYI, some of the facts in the description that you provided are misstated. For example, the horse interfered did eventually finish fourth, but there was superfecta wagering on the race.) In that case, I would have to believe that the issue was whether the Plesa horse (ridden by Prado) that was slammed very hard by the winner (ridden by Bridgmohan) was cost an opportunity to finish in the money. The stewards kept the winner up, but gave Bridgmohan days for careless riding.
I bet Pelican and thought she should be taken down...

The chart guy must have also felt the same because he said she clobbered the other horse despite having an open path inside.
Reply With Quote