Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
I'm disappointed it doesn't have anything to address job creation, for example.
I'm disappointed they want to maintain a 700 billion dollar deficit (the permanent extension of all Bush tax cuts).
I lived through Newt's "Contract with America". It was ugly the first time around.
|
Companies, not government, create jobs.
If an extension of tax cuts results in a deficit, then the spending is too high. Period.
What was so ugly about the Contract with America? It was only a promise of what issues to bring up for a vote in the first 100 days of the 1994 session of Congress.