View Single Post
  #8  
Old 09-21-2010, 01:14 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

I wonder how many sober people (with tinted windows) they bother just because they can. Wish we could vote on whether we have the right to tint our car windows the way we see fit. Don't know why we so easily gave that up to them. They really need this extra portion of corn? They have enough tools without using this excuse to bug people that pay their salaries. They should pull someone over for bad driving. An SUV that time of the morning? For tinted windows? Fishing. Why do they need the right to pull everyone with tinted windows over at 5 in the morning? How many times have they pulled people over like this that are simply on their way to make an early plane flight etc.?....... A lot......... Lets vote on whether tinted windows should be such obvious corn for these guys. Because he was drunk, this won't be popular, but you're not seeing how many people are being stopped just because they want their privacy (tinted windows,) and cops don't want them to have their privacy. I want to vote on it. Are they looking at race and sex before they decide who (driving with tinted windows) they are gunna bug at that time of day? I bet they are. I bet a 60 year old drunk White Lady (with tinted windows, and driving well) would of been able to skate on home. It's just unnecessary corn. If he was so drunk, they should of stopped him for driving wrecklessly. They might have done just that, if they'd of waited for signs of that, but they were too quick to do a tint stop on a minority male in an SUV (at 5 in the morning.) This stopping people for tinted windows is an invasion of privacy, and it's a tool (corn they don't need) that will never be used in a color-blind way.

Last edited by SCUDSBROTHER : 09-21-2010 at 01:51 PM.
Reply With Quote