View Single Post
  #2  
Old 08-01-2010, 05:25 PM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AeWingnut View Post
California Supreme Court declined to review a Court of Appeal decision that forced Hari Wilburn, a homeless man, to pay tens of thousands of dollars in child support for a child even though DNA excludes him as the dad and he never acted as the dad.

According to the American Association of Blood Banks, 30 percent of DNA paternity tests nationwide turn out negative. "That figure is out of about 300,000 tests per year," said Angelucci. "At least 100,000 tests are negative per year in the U.S., and that's only men who get tested. This is a serious, under-addressed problem."


Blood Banks are associated with Paternity Tests?

http://www.eworldwire.com/pressreleases/211794
if you read the coa decision, it's only about proper service of the suit. and it was a slam dunk. which is why the supreme court declined to review it.

it has nothing to do with merits of the case. you have a limited amount of time to respond to a civil suit. if you don't, the plaintiff doesn't have to wait forever for you.

this has been settled law for centuries. there's nothing to discuss.
Reply With Quote