Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
You can't have it both ways. If you want to say that George screwed them up for 20 years, then you can't say that its all about the money.
This is not nitpicking or semantics. Its a logical fallacy.
|
Surely you understand that George is an outlier to this hypothesis? Are you trying to discount the insanity that swirled round the team during that period? As soon as George was out of the picture the team became a mini- dynasty. As soon as his fingerprints got back on the team they faded and again were resurrected when his health started to fail. He alone was the divisive factor that countered the huge financial advantage and when he is out of the picture the advantage becomes evident.