Thread: Saturday Beyers
View Single Post
  #41  
Old 07-11-2010, 02:03 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
There is no way they should put a 115 in the paper. If that is done, they look like fools in the future.

Blind Luck overcame a moderate pace to win from the back. There is simply no way she ran a 115 with the pace that way, or even close. I can buy a high 90s at best. I'm not saying the 94 is dead accurate, that is not possible. But I would say the chances the 94 are correct are much higher than a 115, because the chances a 115 are correct are none.

As for PA, you know why you were banned. It had ZERO to do with Beyer figures.
No, it had nothing to do with Beyers. It had everything to do with me expressing my opinion.

(And somebody's lackey misquoting me in the process.)

As for your point about them "looking like fools"... I think this is actually the problem. There is a concern they need to justify why or why not a horse repeats or doesn't repeat a performance- when they owe nothing.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote