Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
You haven't come up with any sort of defense for Obama, Holder and the DOJ. You mentioned that World Net Daily is not a good source but that is irrelevant since the facts of this story are not in dispute.
I don't know how you can defend Holder on this one. If you like a DOJ that allows this type of behavior and only prosecutes certain races, then I don't know what to say.
I'm still not sure what your position is on this case. Are you saying that you approve of the way the Department of Justice handled this case?
|
I love it when logic is used in a discussion -- it's very refreshing.
I've been waiting to see who's going to defend Holder on this, and the silence is deafening, as it should be, since there is no valid defense for this. The government is overtly acting in a racist manner. Period.
This even defies the invalid rules many proponents have put forward about discrimination, citing that civil rights are only violated when the responsible party "has power over you". This is to ensure a one-way enforcement like what we are now seeing. A white guy gets mugged at gunpoint in a black neighborhood, and somehow that's not a hate crime or a civil rights violation, but the reverse would be. This is the fantasy world of law enforcement they actively try to sustain. But now, since the president is half African American, he arguably "has power over" the disenfranchised caucasian litigants.