Quote:
Originally Posted by dean smith
So you don't think celebrities, background stories and slick television production matter to the "casual" fan? That's simply a wrong opinion to have, lady. Look, this is more than the biggest racing day of the year, it's an all day commercial for the sport -- a sport that already screwed itself sideways in the '50s and '60s by refusing to embrace the medium of television.
I look forward to the network race productions during Triple Crown season. Other than Breeder's Cup, it's the only time of year you can watch the sport being treated like the major sporting event it should be. Sure, I do my handicapping and watch the board at home on the computer, but how does anyone say with a straight face the race itself is not simply awesome in HD with all the different angles and cutaways to the human drama?
|
The problem is that horseracing does not derive its revenue in the same manner as other televised sports. Casual baseball fans may be motivated to attend a few games, buy some merchandise, follow a hometown team on the local tv/radio network, etc. None of that is a signifigant source of income for horseracing. We depend on gambling, for better or worse. The network is simply catering to the viewers it believes will create the highest ratings while using the telecast to promote other network shows. The exposure that racing gets is for televised events is nice but I dont know that the human interest stories or different camera angles contribute an iota to creating the new "fans that we need, the ones that gamble. The dude that won the 100k probably turned more lights on in potential fans that racing needs by promoting the best aspect of horseracing, the ability to make money.