View Single Post
  #65  
Old 09-26-2006, 05:30 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
Exactly right! I don't understand how some of these other posters don't see this. I guess they just see what they want to see.
Obviously none of you have ever been associated with anyone of celebrity so i will inform you of how interviews work.

When two parties agree to an interview, topics are discussed and time on said topics is agreed upon beforehand. President Clinton's purpose for the interview was primarily to discuss Climate Change and time was to be devoted to that topic or else he would not have agreed.

When that idiot started in on PRESIDENT Clinton, it was obvious that FOX wasnt going to live up their end of the bargain. That IS a hatchet job.

Unfortunately, most dont know this so it comes across that Mr. Clinton was just getting aggressive with Wallace.

Now, do i think that Clinton knew beforehand that Wallace would take this approach? Of course he did. Even his strongest detractors would agree that Mr. Clinton is a brilliant man. He knew that he was going to come down on Wallace before he came on the set. Regardless, Wallace was in the wrong for going away from the agreed upon topic. Now...does that make sense?

Clinton took that moron apart just like he did the late Peter Jennings a few years back. heck, just like he did Bob Dole and George the 1st. You guys do remember what he did to your boy George in those debates dont you? If your memory is lapsing, go google it.

Yes, Mr. Clinton was a two term president by a landslide. He was rated top ten presidents by a group of historians in terms of domestic and foreign policy. He didnt need any hanging chads or any of that stuff.
Reply With Quote