By the way, it is not surprising that Clinton wants people to read Clarke's book. Overall, Clarke's book was relatively positive on Clinton.
How is Clarke more credible than James Woolsey, who was the CIA Director under Clinton. You obviously haven't heard Woolsey's description of what took place under Clinton with regard to fighting terrorism.
You need to listen to both sides. You seem to think that everyting one side is true and that everything the other side says is lies and propaganda. That is not the case.
By the way, if a docu-drama is done about the Bush Administration, there will several scenes that make Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc look bad. I'm sure they will complain and say that many of the specific scenes in the movie did not happen. I'm sure that would be true that the specific scenes did not happen, yet the overall story would be accurate. I won't be gullible enough to think that the whole docu-drama is inaccuarte just because they complain that certain things didn't happen.
|