Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Let me repeat myself so this is clear. I never said anything about Ken McPeek other than suggest that his horses at the recent Keeneland meet were better than 50k types. You were the one who brought the guy up. Sightseek was the one who had her little temper tantrum after I pointed out her list wasn't relevant (those are horses from his entire training career, not the last meet at Keeneland). If I want to insult or knock Ken McPeek I will do so to him directly. I have no such desire to do so other than to point out his horses may be a little more expensive than you are giving them credit for. He is having a great year and I have nothing bad to say about him here. Nor have I. Since you and sightseek havent backed up your assertion with any tangible evidence I maintain my stance. If you or her or someone else were to provide evidence to the contrary I would say that I was wrong. Get drugs to look it up. Otherwise you are simply making implications about me that simply are not true.
|
Its a shame you require the Rainman of Racing to prove what you should have witnessed and admired weeks ago. Not a issue, once the Rainman comes back from subway(he had a 15% off coupon) he will rep all the purchase prices of McPeeks special Keeneland meet. Anything else we all can do as a community to enlighten you..lol
A simple "so that is how you do it" will suffice..fair enough?