Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scav
I wasn't being negative on McPeek that much, I was just pointing out something I consider extreme on his part. I think it would be much smarter for him to be selling 80% for the total sale price instead of marking up the horse up. I would have no issue with him keeping 20% and recouping his expense.
All this is really means nothing because the guy is doing really well right now. Lets see where alot of these two year olds are late in their 3 year old year though. Personally, I would rather have a horse progress and be around for 20 starts, then have them blow their load within their first two starts and be a 10nw3 claimer by November of their 3 year old year.
|
20 starts what horses race 20 times anymore? That is like 30 months of training after the first start.. 20 starts your funny..
BTW how is McPeek going to sell other partnerships to the same people if he isnt winning early? Think about it the point is to get people to win money and reinvest it in new stock how does winning late help? There is a method to winning early beside the
fun joy and profit..lol
You figure those 2 and 3 year old wins at Keeneland in allowance and stakes company dont personally work for you? Yeah I see your point winning stakes at Keeneland must suck.