Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk
Hey, Rupert!
I know EXACTLY what this is referencing, so I'm happy to shed a little light-- the Republicans in Congress, who have been objecting to raising the minimum wage for several years, put in a bill to raise it-- in the same bill pushing to repeal the estate tax. The estate tax, of course, affects the estates of only the super super rich (top 2 percent) and ending it would really affect the gov't revenue, and eventually, support programs for people who don't have multimillion dollar estates. What the Dems are objecting to is not raising the minimum wage, but repealing the estate tax. But since the Republicans were crafty and put them in the same bill, by voting down the one they vote down the other. So, that's why Frist claims the Dems don't want the minimum wage raised. It's not that. It's that they don't want the estate tax repealed. They're making a hard decision-- voting down the immediate benefit of the working poor so as not to hurt them farther down the road, with the loss of the estate tax income. And I think they're hoping they can regain Congress soon, and get it raised without having to give dead rich guys a handout, too. They're in a tough position though. Hope they do the right thing.
As angry as this move by the Republicans makes me (putting the wage raise in the same bill as the estate tax repeal) I have to admire their craftiness-- they really know how to play the game to make the opposing side look like the bad guys, because they figure most people won't take time to explore the full story. Good for you for not taking it at face value.
Here's an interesting essay on the estate tax.
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20060515&s=trb051506
DTS, I'll read the article in a few days. This is the first I've even been on DT today-- very busy at work! Miss you all much, my favorite libbers, cons, and swingers. 
|
it's a shame that legit legislation always gets hamstrung by both parties when they do things like that. it's why some want a line item veto.
other problem is, if one guy votes against pork, then the guy who's state doesn't get the pork will vote against legit spending involving the first guy. how can we get anything done that way?