Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Coach Pants
Sickening. You clearly don't understand the basic aspects of business ethics and you have the audacity to make light of the situation.
|
having multiple roles does not constitute a "conflict of roles" in a vacuum.
It has to be "possible" for improper acts to occur.
i'm not picking a sidde one way or the other (aside from bashing SG's ridiculous post in that other thread), but in order to make allegations like this, a legal definition of the ACTS themselves has to be formulated.
PROMOTING HIS JOCKEY WHILE ANNOUNCING
WARNING/ADVISING HIS JOCKEY DURING THE RACE
those are just 2 that i could come up with feel free to add more. Then you have to prove that they are at least possible and significant acts.
IF they aren't possible and significant then there is no case whatsoever.