Thread: Who thinks...
View Single Post
  #46  
Old 09-11-2006, 03:11 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk
You're right, except Saddam was/is Sunni and the majority are Shiite. Shiite's are much more fundamentalist than the Sunnis.

Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11; I feel our administration hoodwinked our country into backing the Iraq invasion. That said, Danzig is right on the money about the current situation-- we've been half-assing the Iraq thing all along (not the soldiers, of course, who are showing up and doing their jobs-- the people in charge of them). But I'm scared of what will happen to the region if we pull out as things are now-- destablize further? Massacres between Shiites and Sunnis? Women's rights going the way of the Taliban? I kind of feel like, we broke it; we bought it, you know? We started this for all the wrong reasons, but now I feel like we have to finish it, but not in the current fashion. As much because we owe it to the Iraqis now as because we owe it to ourselves. But where's the $$, the manpower, the leadership? Dear God, what a mess...
We were hoodwinked because the Bush family is in bed with the House of Saud. The House of Saud doesn't want bin Laden harmed and that's why a few months after 9/11, February 2006 to be exact, we pulled most of our special ops and CIA paramilitary troops out of the mountains of Afghanistan to focus on Saddam.


It's all smoke and mirrors. This "war on terror" shows the muslim world how weak we are. The majority of the hijackers were Saudis who were funded by bin Laden's Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda was protected by the Taliban. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. George Bush has ADHD and early stages of senility.


At least that's my opinion which is purely speculation splashed with a large dose of common sense.
Reply With Quote