Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Merlinsky
I'm confused though. What damages is he arguing? He can call them stupidheads for not telling him about the sale but is he saying he wanted to be able to have first refusal or something? It seems like you could just spell that out. If there are no damages, exactly what would he be suing to have happen? He got the bonus he was entitled to. A contract is a contract and I suppose if they breached then that's not good but there's a point where the judge might say 'uh yeah, you're right in principle, here's $1 now don't you feel special?'
|
Since he is still 50% owner he obviously wanted to have some control, or perhaps right of refusal of any new owners that might be brought on board. You're right...a contract is a contract, but it seems they breached it, although I found it interesting that any damages he is seeking are not detailed?