Quote:
|
Originally Posted by the_fat_man
Where exactly am I out of line here? I patiently went along making my point and someone chose to take a jab at me. I guess it got to where he couldn't come up with anything else. I know it sucks being shown to be off base but if he can't make the argument correctly why bother getting in there in the first place?
I have no problem with anyone who wants to learn. I'm here for informative exchanges. But this appears to be happening less and less. The people I want to hear from don't really post much of substance anymore. Guess they learned the hard way as well. What we really need here is more Hank Goldberg, Kenny Mayne, Nicanor, etc. type posts. Would that do it for you?  |
First of all, You were the one taking the "first jab."
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by the_fat_man
Right. Rather than just accept that the horse wasn't good enough and wouldn't have won under just about any circumstances:
We assume, that in a race with a few other on the pace types, HS will not only run them off their feet but will be going so fast that BOTH Curlin and the filly will have to move too soon, thus getting run off their feet, as well. And, after all this, HS will have enough to win going 12F.
Yeah
|
Second, I
had chosen to let it go, rather than continue with your false assumptions after I pointed out correctly the misinterpretations you made and added a zing as a tit-for-tat. You couldn't handle it. You really shouldn't let people push you buttons so easily. You have a lot to learn. good luck.