Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up
I thought this was a gem from Brown (T-graph):
"I made points in my rundown both as to why MTB might bounce and why he might not. I said that because he might have liked the off track, figured to get a wider trip this time, and would be relatively short,he was tough to use. I also made the point RIGHT AFTER THE DERBY that he didn't have to bounce. "
So your methodology did not yield a definitive conclusion if the horse would bounce...but traditional handicapping, you know the perfect trip in the derby, the slop, and the odds prevented you from liking him.
Its probably me but thats funny for $25 bucks.
|
The specific Preakness card analysis was $15. Full sheets for a single card are $25. And it's about interpretation of the figures and patterns, and even Jerry isn't right 100% of the time or able to guarantee how every horse in 20 or 13 horse fields are going to perform.
As someone who utilizes Thoro-Graph and represents the product, my own interpretation of the figs and patterns resulted in my tabbing 1.) Rachel Alexandra, 2.) Musket Man and 3.) Mine That Bird as my top three... so clearly that version of the outcome could have been projected by TG sheets users.
And as a sidenote, that $25 for the Preakness card TG's would have put you in position to spot potential performances like No Advatage's ($28), Motown Shuffle's ($40) and Everyday Heroes ($16) in addition to that Preakness Triple.