Quote:
Originally Posted by justindew
This is why you are a moron. You still have no idea what the discussion is about. Here's the sequence of events:
1. You said POTN had beaten horrendous horses.
2. I pointed out that this was a ridiculous statement.
3. You rescinded your original statement.
4. Feeling defeated, you tried to turn the discussion to value.
5. I asked you to define value.
6. Instead of defining value, you told me where you felt the value was, then claimed victory.
7. I reminded you to define value.
8. You changed the topic and then claimed to be the one sticking to the topic.
I actually agree somewhat with your definition of value. But since I like POTN more than Dunkirk and I suspect they will be similar odds, I think POTN offers better value.
I think it's pretty clear here that you are at a higher level intellectually than I am. It's probably in my best interest to quit now, and retreat into hiding.
|
His last two races he did beat horrendous horses. I guess I should have been more specific. I have never felt defeated. Not sure where you are getting that from.
Points 3-8 in your little list are absolutely not true. You really are an idiot Justin. Typical you. When you are wrong you just try and turn things around. I answered every thing you threw at me. I am sorry if you couldn't follow along.
Dunkirk and POTN will not be similar odds. I think you are nuts.
As far as intelligence, I am far from a genius, but when having a conversation on here with you I feel like one. This is a repeat of our little spat last year. You take things I say and try and turn them around, fail, and then give up.
This is classic Justindew.