Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
It was obviously not a well thought out policy and as you say positive PR motivated. But keeping these three trainers banned under a bad rule in no way helps animal welfare. They didnt have to announce the reinstatements at all but they did. What would be the proper punishment for someone found to be improperly accused? People who truly care about animal welfare should send the track an email stating that they should spend some money on the issue and set up an adoption program or at the very least a humane euthanasia program instead of a lame zero tolerence policy that can't be properly enforced or monitored.
|
And it was probably instituted in a hurry to shut up well-meaning animal lovers who don't think through to the root of the problem, which is too many unwanted horses. But they don't want to think about a complicated issue, so they focus on "horse slaughter bad!" make a stink, the racetrack management does the quickest thing it can think of to make the problem go away (okay! No slaughter tolerated here!) and then everyone is satisfied for a little while except the horses, who don't see any improvement in their eventual fates because nothing effective actually gets done.
If people want a long-term solution they're going to have to be willing to put pressure on the racing industry to (pardon the pun) pony up the $$ to see that the horses' retirements are funded and that the ones too infirm to enjoy a quality of life get humanely euthanized. But that's a lot of work because it requires owners and/or trainers and/or racetracks and/or the states that have race tracks to give up something, even though it likely would be a very small amount of money individually or per state (I would guess less than one percent of stakes purses or even handle would do wonders in funding rescue places). And in the ongoing war between kindness and commerce, I think kindness usually doesn't fare well.
And I think a lot of these animal lovers aren't really willing to put in the time and effort to work for a solution that would actually be in the best interests of the horses. How many anti-horse slaughter people do I know who eat factory-raised beef, poultry or pork? They're against horse cruelty, but, while they feel kind of bad about the fact that the chicken they're eating spent its short miserable life in an 8X10 cage with six other birds (with their beaks cut off), actually doing something about that would require inconveniencing themselves (spending more money on humanely raised meat, or limiting their meat intake) so they don't bother. And yet they expect people in the racing industry to be better human beings than they are because horses are prettier than chickens? Give me a break.
Sorry to ramble- I went on the page of one of the places involved in the Paragallo mares and the long list of very nice looking horses up for adoption really depressed me. So many horses and so few homes.