Quote:
|
Originally Posted by miraja2
Still can't find anything huh?
If you refuse to answer my questions....that is fine....I consider the matter closed.
As for me saying that no scholar would call Bush a socialist, I shouldn't have said that and have admitted so in this thread. That was a legitimate overstatement on my part.
As for Roubini, I called him a "generally resepected economist" which I don't see as calling him unreliable.
Again, my point is relatively simple. If George W. Bush was a socialist, don't you think there would be a lot of socialist scholars celebrating this great shift by the G.O.P. to socialism? You have yet to give a single example of such an instance or answer my repeated attempts to get you to explain how a man who disagrees with probably 99% of what a party stands for is actually the same ideologically as that Party.
If you choose to celebrate that as a victory in this discussion, I know of nothing else to do other than to offer you my heartfelt congratulations.
|
I have provided my links, where are yours??????? Seriously, you have to have something....anything. Guess not.
I must forward your book suggestions to hugo chavez and nouriel roubini. Neither of them know the correct definition of socialism used among chicago area night school scholars (sorry, i know that was cheap, but you threw the sarah palin at me so it was deserved)
Thank you for the congrats. My day is now complete...and so early in the morning.