|
Originally Posted by prudery
Just as an irrelevant aside on those sixties...
During the revolt/revolution/liberation heady days of the sixties, for some, it was like joining a club ...
--Only this club went against all most people's parents were for, and many traditions ...like sex outside the office and highly stimulating dope rather than sissy scotch.
It was new, exciting, full of questions, and MUCH beneficial came out of it, some of which we enjoy today ...like sex outside the office and highly stimulating dope rather then sissy scotch.
Though I shared a belief for change and improvement, and also LOVED sex outside the office, I did not join those clubs, though I LOVE sex outside the office,many people I knew did ...
I never bought into a violent revolution, but some did---as in the Chicago 7 and Bill Hartack.
My boyfriend at the time, was a plummah, ne'er-do-well and successful conscientious objecter when it suited him. He never objected to sex outside the office. .... Somewhat later he became a Government Witness, and now he is on the run from LCN....
My association with him reflects none of the above ( ?? )... And my current association with him is based on who he is today---a nice, bald, fat dumbazz on the run. Good riddance to him. ...
I would suspect many of the Club revolutionaries and hippies I knew would be singularly embarrassed by their previous
Krishna-Krishna, Hari Rum Na's ... The ex is not---he is somewhat the same guy, but with different values ......ie....he doesn't have any.....
I am confounded by Ayers' contemporary comments, but I feel that if he were a current threat to society, he would have been shot ...
Obama's associations with him were in today's educational arena working under the Annenberg umbrella under which there are Republican connections as well......oh ah dunno
|