[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by Danzig

well, since the bar has been set so high (last five years, really?) i guess nothing. staying in training doesn't make him a good horse. he also suffers from a lack of top quality competition. his defeat on turf was turned into 'well not so bad' since he lost to a bc turf winner-yeah, cause red rocks is such a monster....
i think curlin is a good horse, but he also his getting lauded, receiving credit, where it's really not due, due to the fact he's the only decent, classic distance older horse out there. that doesn't make him good, any more than big brown is good because everyone else is bad!
i have been a fan of racing for 35 years. i've seen what is good- i am unwilling and unable to lower my standards so that i can somehow applaud something that really deserves no more applause or attention than the maiden 2 yos who gave me a 78 dollar ex at arlington park a couple weeks ago.
had some of curlins peers remained ( and obviously he has no control over who stays or who retires-i understand that) and made thing interesting, and he still managed to reel off these victories, i'd give him some serious credit.


but having two horses, who most years would be also rans, somehow get called something they aren't, because they are the top of a rotten heap--no, not from me.

i'm glad big brown stayed around since the tc, i'm glad curlin stayed in training. maybe others will do the same, it would be nice. with the downturn in the sales, maybe we'll see more do it as well.

Couldn't agree more with this post.