Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
come on, there was an exchange of ideas. most people on here don't recommend this type of wager with such a microscopic ROI. a few see a place for it. just because most are not in favor of the wager does not mean that people aren't here to exchange ideas and learn. go ahead, become a bridgejumper. if you don't have 200K to start with, start with whatever level you have. if its a good wager for the guy who risked 200K to make 10K, then its also a good wager for someone who wants to risk $2,000 to make $100. keep us posted on your progress. I guarantee that you will last until your first loss, or perhaps your first show photo, and then you will give it up for good.
|
Oh please. Re-read the thread because i just did. For no reason other than I had a different take I was insulted and called childish names. Yeah, great exchange of ideas. Now, I didnt say YOU did. My point is that you make it seem like everyone was just chatting like we were at some cocktail party and that isnt the case. And that is par for the course for any idea that is not "accepted" by the clique. Thats fine...I dont need to be a part of some internet club to feel whole. But please... don't misrepresent.
And even in this last post, you attempt to patronize me and you even make the assumption that I don't already employ bridgejumping as a method at times. How would you know? How can you make these assumptions?
Can I guess, with all of these assumptions, what type of gambler you are and how much success you have had at it?