View Single Post
  #3  
Old 06-26-2008, 02:10 PM
pgardn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockey2315
But they can't be the reason for the horse winning. . . They can be the reason for the horse not losing.
So if a jock gets lucky and makes 3 good decisions during a difficult race (crowded or some other scenario) and the horse wins... handicappers should say he allowed the horse to win. One would never conclude (if a jock made multiple correct decisions in a number of tough spots) that a horse could not have won if it were not for those correct decisions.
Reply With Quote