Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
This is what happens whenever there is an obvious bias.People look to tell people it ain't the case.I'm gunna tell ya again that this horse is easily best,and the reason he isn't close in mid race is the track is against him.Gomez will get up on a fair track with that much horse.Even if he makes mistakes.He is that good on a rater who is willing.See,this is SOCAL HORSERACING.They have a biased track today.They will have 3 days to get it back.It will probably be better Thursday,and people will say it wasn't biased Monday.It's gunna vary back n' forth now.The only reason I mention this stuff is cuz I know why people get beat.People say "they can't pick a winner" Well,you can pick the best horse,and it's not gunna win if the track is against him.Then they start trying to cap for the surface,and the track changes,or the jocks start adjusting inconsistently.Then they are told the track isn't biased etc...........Wait for a fair track,or you gunna be messed up.Wait until the best horse can get up.Then play.If you don't then I can tell you what you will say:"I'M TAKING A BREAK FOR A WHILE."
|
gomez thought he had more horse and didnt..you say this isnt fair ect why do you say it is not fair when front runners win/ the 8 in race 7 off the pace types win the 2 in race 9 and pressers win the 1 in race 1.. this surface is fair .. the aq inner last year was not fair ..but people adjusted to it....the best horse is a very broad statment..and therefore not exact in what we are talking about imo